Beocast #7 – Valgspecial 2007 på gaden!
-
Arkiver
Så i går DR’s-interview i Venstres valgbus med Ekstra Bladets Michael Jeppesen om Se og Hørs anklager mod Naser Khader.
Update: Thomas Ladegaard beskriver sammenfiltringen af interesser og sagens voldsomme uldenhed (bedre end jeg selv orker).
I serien af konjunktive poster
Hvis jeg havde tid ville jeg folde følgende idéer ud:
Gå mere i dybden med:
The most successful writer-personas now and into the future — at least those interested in “making a living” as you put it — will be those who can take on varying flux personas via the act of writing.
Skrive længere om:
Forholde mig til:
Den sædvanlige wordpress opsamling:
Started writing a loooong (and unreadable) essay about how we should try and understand politics with the help of the idealism/materialism dichotomy (in the strictest philosophical sense), rather than through the worn-out and shattered left/right glasses.
But for now: somehow things got all muddled up. Fundamentally, the left is materialistic, and the right is idealistic, not the other way round. If you accept that premise, it helps you understand everything much better, and can perhaps make you rethink your political standpoint, without the constraints of the left/right straitjacket.
Appliance: whenever confronted with a political proposal, try to figure out whether the politician believes in the basic thesis that the objective reality shapes our lives. The answer usually reveals a swarm of self-contradictions, and that behind their valuesystems, most politicians are either deeply confused or two-tongued hypocrites.
Hope to elaborate on that. Some, sunny day.